Anna Achacoso (Music)

15 Responses to “Anna Achacoso (Music)”

1. 05-21830 on May 29th, 2008 2:12 am

   Madame Anna, sikapin mo sanang magagap ang importansya ng sining at kultura sa paghubog ng buhay at kaisipan ng mga iskolar ng bayan. Walang silbi ito kung hindi nito mapapatalas ang panlipunang kamulatan ng mga iskolar ng bayan.

   Others chose to be silent and irrelevant because of their limitations. Now, as CCA head, you have the ability to realize their unspoken relevance in action, an ability that has in the recent years gone to waste. Here’s to hoping that the wasting ends now.

2. Francis Serina on June 13th, 2008 1:10 am

   I’ve worked with Anna before and I can definitely say that she’s the right person to head CCA. From UP Concert Chorus to CMu Student Council Councilor to CMu Representative to the USC and CCA Head, Anna has definitely grown wiser, more mature and stronger these past few years.

   I couldn’t be more fascinated to see her earnestly serve the community. I’m definitely sure that both her College and the University is proud of her!

3. 05-21830 on June 13th, 2008 9:18 pm

   I don’t agree that a promoter of “art for art’s sake” is “definitely the right person”. Credit is due, though, to her admitting not to be in the know of the social implications of art (as indicated in their GA minutes). If she is willing to take time in understanding the importance of art that seeks to be a prime mover and not a simple life still, it would truly be fascinating.

4. para sa bayan on June 13th, 2008 9:32 pm

   regardless.. i think the issue whether someone should be in the position or not is over. Nothing will happen if people continue to bash here and there. This is so philippine government-ish. 05-21830… you may suggest but don’t bash people because it only hinders them from doing their jobs and their plans. For once, please STOP sourgraping.

5. 05-21830 on June 13th, 2008 10:06 pm

   This “Bashing” you speak of is constructive. If any, she should appreciate that people are following her actions intently in hope of her fulfillment of her duties as CCA head.

   Was there any indication in my statement saying of my complete disregard of her mandate? Does pointing out valid flaws in order to safeguard problematic tendencies not count as constructive criticism? Or are your notions of constructive criticism be nothing but flowered words of ultra-positivity? Do read my first comment before your blue-tinted notions start “bashing” my comments as destructive.

   Honestly, what’s to sour grape about? STAND UP puts its plans of action in PRACTICE regardless of whatever happens. Unlike “government-ish” traditional politicians who are only good for as long as their campaign is ongoing.

6. para sa bayan on June 14th, 2008 1:04 pm

   im sorry 05-21830, but you just contradicted yourself. have a good day.

7. 05-21830 on June 14th, 2008 10:01 pm

   Where exactly? Do point it out so we can set things straight, unless of course, what you’re doing is simply for effect for lack of reason.

   As an aside, one wonders why you are so dogged to claim negative sentiments towards Ms. Achacoso? Why so defensive about it? Does constructive criticism only hurts if the defensive party really has no intention to keep these things in mind.

   Obviously, though, you are not Ms. Achacoso. So sige, ipagpatuloy mo lang ang iyong mga lutang na asumpsyon sa buhay. maayong araw sayo.

8. sjsanjuan on June 15th, 2008 6:46 pm

   Well, people saw her Committee’s GPOA that was presented during the GA, and presumably, she won by the force of that GPOA. So, if her term as CCA will be judged at the end of her term, then it should be done using her GPOA as basis for constructive criticism, and not our own political biases and ideologies.

   You’re not doing constructive criticism, because you’re imposing your own belief of what art should be, and doing so in a rather irate manner. Of course, there are those who are saying that art should serve the nation. There are those who say that art is a lifestyle. Then there are those who just want art as self-fulfillment. There is no point bashing her here. But what you can do educate her with how you see art, not malign her belief system and cast aspersion on her person.

9. 05-21830 on June 16th, 2008 12:12 am

   Constructive Criticism should be based not upon her own ideological merits alone, such pluralist thought only serves to keep apparatuses of the state tightly in the hands of those in power. And as such, I am criticizing her for bannering elitist art that serves to maintain the cultural status quo that NEUTERS nationalism and critical thinking. If it was a bash as is being alleged, it would have been a simple “you suck” statement. As demonstrated in my previous critiques, I pointed out the flaws of her cultural ideology while demonstrating (or educating, as you put it) what art should be with the Philippine Society in context, at least according to something even as basic as Art Studies 1 or Basic Editorial Design in Fine Arts.

   You are right that it is only presumable, seeing as Col. Rep. Messina’s own GPOA was undermined by blue politicking in the GPOA presentation of CCA head candidates, and so her mandate indeed warrants aspersions. But this is already over and done with, and is no longer an issue for me, so we center on the point of what culture of art she is to use as CCA head, which is why I am careful to remind her again and again of their promise of willingness to learn of the social implications of arts and culture.

   So please, stop with this post-modernist notons of absolute equality between all interpretations of something as socially-relevant as arts and culture. Post-modernism already contradicts itself by imposing the idea, “irately” even, that every interpretation of art is each to its own merit. If Ms. Achacoso is willing to learn this, then maybe her apologists should, too.

10. sjsanjuan on June 16th, 2008 6:03 pm

    Mmm… Why would I stop my so-called post-modernist beliefs? You think that your notion of absolutism is the only valid belief here? If that’s what you think, then I guess that’s just too arrogant, don’t you think?

    Unfortunately for you, we are in a university that has a diverse belief system. And for you to simply impose your belief as the one true ideology is an insult to those who hold other leanings.

11. para sa bayan on June 16th, 2008 9:53 pm

    05-21830: who are you to deem what is elitist and what is not?! Are u saying that only Popular Art is the TRUE ART? You are very fascist in saying what art should be based on your ideological thinking. Don’t impose. Let people decide on their own. I’m sure students in UP have the intelligence to discern on their own. PLEASE, your imposing nature is getting quite irritating.

12. 05-21830 on June 17th, 2008 9:14 am

    It only appears as arrogance and imposition to those insecure of the validity of their own beliefs. A pluralist school of thought would only ensure that nothing damaging be done to those who hold control over our culture anytime soon.

    It isn’t so much about respect, more about credibility. Complete tolerance of even the most unreasonable ideals is nothing but disorder. We have long been taught in UP to be SCIENTIFICALLY critical in our analyses, not only in our academics but in REAL life as well. Arts and culture IS life. And it is in a society where neutrality of culture has resulted into colonial mentality, social apathy, and escapism.

    This kind of thought is simply brought about by ignorance, by inability to be scientifically critical of analysis, and to be oriented in wanting to propagate the regressive nature of the status quo. Thinking that a mass-oriented culture is absolutist is also one born of ignorance, too. That is the problem of putting art on top of an ivory tower. Have you ever asked yourself for whom your brand of art serves?

    If you really want the USC to remain neutered, what else would its purpose be? The USC was not established to simply be a tailist slave of the wanton desires of its constituents. The USC was founded to guide and empower the studentry. You are really a simpleton if you interpret this as an imposition, it isn’t mandatory sir.

    If you refuse to subscribe to reason, that is not my problem. It does turn into a problem if it becomes the general sentiment that leads to social irrelevance. THAT is an insult to the name ISKOLAR ng BAYAN.

13. 01-98128 on June 22nd, 2008 3:10 am

    05-21830:

    You said it your self- as UP students, we are taught to be scientifically critical in analyzing certain issues. We are not robots who simply follow a certain imposed framework. True, the USC does not exist simply to listen to different sides. Even worse, it definitely SHOULD NOT listen to just one side. It is the challenge of the USC to strike a balance between the different schools of thought through consulting with the students, trying its best not to alienate any group, no matter how small.

    In line with this, who are you to judge that the constituents desires are wanton?? This is very arrogant of you. Please be more tactful next time. Please clarify if the word (wanton) was just misused- I hope it is because I find that comment really insulting. It’s funny that you claim this isn’t an imposition.

    I agree with you that the USC exists to guide and empower the studentry. However, how can you achieve this if the students themselves are not involved in the THINKING process (since your framework is pre-imposed and ideas contrary to yours are wanton- of course you can argue on this)? Whose interest will the USC be advancing? Ultimately, it should be the interest of the students, not the personal interest of certain USC members.

14. Jeff Crisostomo on June 24th, 2008 9:48 pm

    “Art for art’s sake” may be questionable to some, but “critique for critique’s sake” is just plain pathetic. Can you please stop being so obviously political about this and start being a true iskolar ng bayan– someone who, no matter the political affiliation, is constructive for the benefit of genuine service. Apparently you are not such. If you can’t stop “sourgraping”, just shut up. There’s no room for your blind views here. Better find something else to rant about.

    On a lighter note, I that Anna will perform well as CCA Chair. At this point, she’s doing great. Keep up the good work.

    -Jeff Crisostomo (CCA Chairperson 2007-2008)

15. Sophia San Luis on June 26th, 2008 6:31 am

    05-21830:
    You are right that it is only presumable, seeing as Col. Rep. Messina’s own GPOA was undermined by blue politicking in the GPOA presentation of CCA head candidates, and so her mandate indeed warrants aspersions.

    I resent this statement. I was the one who raised the motion to disqualify Rep. Mesina from proposing for CCA. I am not from any party and the reason for my objection has nothing to do with politics. The Representative from Fine Arts came in late, on a day he was scheduled to propose. Prior to that, he left and returned an hour late, on a day they were slated to propose first. These are the facts surrounding my motion, facts that you conveniently omitted. Thank you.

Got something to say?